IMPORTANT:This page has used Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia in either a refactored, modified, abridged, expanded, built on or 'straight from' text content! (view authors)

File:National Association Against Woman Suffrage.jpg

The sign of the headquarters of the National Association Opposed To Woman Suffrage.

Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th century,[1] is the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other. It can also refer to hatred of, or prejudice towards, either sex as a whole (see misogyny and misandry), or the application of stereotypes of masculinity in relation to men, or of femininity in relation to women.[2] It is also called male and female chauvinism.

Sex discrimination is discrimination on the basis of sex or gender. Certain forms of sexual discrimination are illegal in some countries, while in other countries it may be required by law in various circumstances.[3]

Generalization and partition

In philosophy, sexist attitudes can be understood or judged on the basis of the essential characteristics of the group to which an individual belongs—in this case, their sexual group, as men or women. This assumes that all individuals fit into the category of male or female and does not take into account intersexed people who are born with a mixture of male and female sexual characteristics.[citation needed] This also assumes a significant degree of homogeneity in the characteristics of men and women respectively, and generally does not take into account the differences that exist within these groups. XY males and XX females who are genetically one sex but have developed the characteristics of the opposite sex during the foetal stage are usually considered with respect to their outward characteristics under this system.[4]

sex condition of hatred fears discriminatory anti-discriminatory
discrimination of movement of
female femininity misogyny gynophobia gynocentrism feminism
male masculinity misandry androphobia androcentrism masculism
intersex intersexuality misandrogyny androgynophobia LGBTIQ
transsex transsexuality transphobia LGBT


Template:Discrimination sidebar See also: Women's suffrage

The view that men are superior to women is a form of sexism. When expressed by men, sexism against women may be called male chauvinism. Related terms are misogyny, which implies a hatred of women, and gynophobia, which refers to a fear of women or femininity.

The idea that men benefit from certain rights and privileges not available to women is referred to as male privilege. The idea that women benefit from certain rights and privileges not available to men is referred to as female privilege.

The view that women are superior to men is another form of sexism, and when expressed by a woman may be called female chauvinism or misandry. The hatred of men is called misandry, while androphobia refers to the fear of men or masculinity.


Gender stereotypes are formed at an early age with men and women being identified with particular occupations. Much work is being done to challenge such gender stereotyping, especially to encourage women to enter professions which have traditionally been a largely male domain, such as construction and engineering. The June 2002 Review by the Social Science Research Unit, University of London [5] concluded that tackling gender stereotyping at the primary school stage is vital, as it develops early and quickly. Various interventions were reviewed including the use of fiction in challenging gender stereotypes.

For example, in a study by A. Wing, children were read Bill’s New Frock by Anne Fine. The content of the book was discussed with them. Children were able to articulate, and reflect on, their stereotypical constructions of gender and those in the world at large. There was evidence of children considering ‘the different treatment that boys and girls receive’, and of classroom discussion enabling stereotypes to be challenged.

Legal status

U.S. and English law subscribed until the 20th century to the system of coverture, whereby "by marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law; that is the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage."[6]

Not until 1875 were women in the U.S. legally defined as persons (Minor v Happersett, 88 U.S. 162),[7] and women did not receive the vote in the U.S. until 1920[7] and in the U.K. until 1918.

Domestic violence

In the most serious cases of domestic violence, men dominate.[citation needed] Women are much more likely to be murdered by an intimate partner, regardless of who started the fight. Among the persons killed by an intimate partner, about three quarters are female, and about a quarter are male: in 1999, in the US, 1,218 women and 424 men were killed by an intimate partner, regardless of which partner started the violence and of the gender of the partner.[8] In the US, in 2005, 1181 females and 329 males were killed by their intimate partners.[9] [10]

The U.S. Center for Disease Control in conjunction with the American Psychiatric Association found that of heterosexual relationships involving violence, 50.3% involve non-reciprocal violence, and of that 50.3%, women were the instigators 70.7% of the time, although "physical injury was more likely to occur when the violence was reciprocal."[11] Linda Kelly states in her thesis, Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse: How Women Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State in the Florida State University Law Review that domestic violence is equally the province of women.[12]

In a UNICEF survey, the percentage of women aged 15–49 who thought that a husband is justified in hitting or beating his wife under certain circumstances, was 90% in Jordan, 85.6% in Guinea, 85.4% in Zambia, 85% in Sierra Leone, 81.2% in Laos, and 81% in Ethiopia.[13]

In a U.S. survey of 5,238 adults regarding the attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence, participants were more accepting of women hitting men, and were consistently more likely to tolerate the violence if they were first asked about women hitting men rather than the reverse.[14]


Research into the factors which motivate perpetrators of rape against women frequently reveals patterns of hatred of women and pleasure in inflicting psychological and/or physical trauma, rather than sexual interest.[15] Feminists have argued that rape is not the result of pathological individuals, but rather of systems of male dominance and from cultural practices and beliefs that objectify and degrade women.[16]

Mary Odem and Jody Clay-Warner, along with Susan Brownwiller, consider sexist attitudes to be propagated by a series of myths about rape and rapists.[17][18] They state that contrary to these myths, rapists often plan a rape before they choose a victim,[16] and that acquaintance rape is the most common form of rape rather than assault by a stranger.[19][20] Odem also states that these rape myths propagate sexist attitudes about men by perpetuating a myth that men cannot control their sexuality.[16]


Women in the past have been excluded from higher education.[21] When women were admitted to higher education, they were encouraged to major in subjects that were considered less intellectual; the study of English literature in English and U.S. colleges and universities was in fact instituted as a field of study considered suitable to women's "lesser intellects."[22] Recently more women than men have entered postsecondary institutions.[23]

Research studies have found that discrimination continues today: Boys receive more attention and praise in the classroom in grade school,[24] and "this pattern of more active teacher attention directed at male students continues at the postsecondary level."[25] Over time, female students speak less and less in classroom settings.[26] A possible reason for the increased attention paid to boys in school is that girls earn higher grades than boys until the end of high school. It is also possible that boys are discriminated against by the school system, as girls in some districts achieve higher grades despite scoring the same or lower than boys on standardized tests.[27]


Women have historically been excluded from participation in many professions. When women have gained entry into a previously male profession, they have faced many additional obstacles; Elizabeth Blackwell, the first woman to receive an M.D. in the United States, and Myra Bradwell, the first female lawyer in the state of Illinois, are examples.

Professional discrimination continues today, according to studies done by Cornell University and others. It has been hypothesized that gender bias has been influencing which scientific research gets published. This hypothesis coincides with a test conducted at the University of Toronto led by Amber Budden. Based on the results of this study, almost 10 percent of female authors get their papers published when their gender is hidden.

In addition, women frequently earn significantly less wages than their male counterparts who perform the same job.[28] In the United States, for example, women earn an average of 23.5% less than men.[29]

Some experts believe that parents play an important role in the creation of values and perceptions of their children. The fact that girls are asked to help their mothers do housework, while boys do technical tasks with their fathers, seems to influence their behavior and can sometimes discourage girls from performing such tasks. Girls will then think that each gender should have a specific role and behavior.[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]

A 2009 study of CEOs found that more men occupying the position were overweight or obese compared to men in the general population, while the reverse held true for female CEOs.[citation needed] The leader of the study stated that the results "suggest that while being obese limits the career opportunities of both women and men, being merely overweight harms only female executives -- and may actually benefit male executives."[38]

At other times, there are accusations that some traditionally female professions have been or are being eliminated by its roles being subsumed by a male dominated profession. The assumption of baby delivery roles by doctors and subsequent decline of midwifery is sometimes claimed to be an example.

Mandatory military service

Many countries around the world make it mandatory for males to join the military, but not females. Men at 18 years of age in the United States are required to register for military conscription to be drafted to war or military service. Women are not required to register with the Selective Service System and have no obligation to serve in the military in the case of a draft. Furthermore, females do not have the option of joining the United States military as an infantry soldier. Mandatory military service is sometimes cited as an example of discrimination against men.


Transphobia refers to prejudice against transsexuality and transsexual or transgender people, based on their personal gender identification (see Phobia - terms indicating prejudice or class discrimination). Whether intentional or not, transphobia can have severe consequences for the person the object of the negative attitude. The LGBT movement has campaigned against sexism against transsexuals. One form of sexism against transsexuals is how many "women-only" and "men-only" events and organizations have been criticized for rejecting trans women and trans men, respectively.[39][40]

Sexual expression

The expression of sexual intimacy is a part of the human condition. However, various aspects of human sexuality have been argued as having contributed to sexism.

Sexual revolution

During the sexual revolution, there was a change in the cultural perception of sexual morality and sexual behavior. The sexual revolution has been known as the sexual liberation by feminists since some saw this new development in the West as a leveling ground for females to have as many choices concerning their sexuality as males—hoping to eliminate the problematic virgin/whore dichotomy of traditional Western society.

Ariel Levy argues that the current state of commercial sexuality has created a "Raunch Culture".[41] She argues that there has been a commercialization of the sexual objectification of women; a cultural, largely Western development that she criticizes as being limiting for men and women. Some feminists argue that rather than being liberating, that a "pornification" of Western society has reduced and equated the scope of feminine power to sexual power only. They argue that women are themselves objectifying other women by becoming producers and promoters of the "Raunch Culture". Gloria Steinem has stated in an interview that: "In the '70s, people confused the sexual revolution with feminism, and the sexual revolution really was about making more women sexually available on men's terms."[42]

Some masculists posit that prior to the sexual revolution the idealized male was expected to be virile while the idealized female was expected to be modest. They argue that after the sexual revolution, women were given more liberty to express virility while the reverse has not been true for men, who have yet to be given a choice to be non-virile. They argue that the dual identity of hypersexuality and asexuality is a luxury and special status that only exists for women.[citation needed] However, many feminists argue that the virgin/whore dichotomy has existed since long before the sexual revolution and that it entails unrealistic categories imposed on women by men, not chosen voluntarily. This dichotomy allows men to condemn women for their sexuality whether it is seen as modest or virile, a no-win situation and a double standard since they argue that this does not apply to men.[43][44]

Sexual objectification

It is argued that sexual objectification is a form of sexism. Some countries, such as Norway and Denmark, have laws against sexual objectification in advertising. Nudity itself is not banned, and nude people can be used to advertise a product, but only if they are relevant to what is being advertised. Sol Olving, head of Norway's Kreativt Forum, an association of the country's top advertising agencies explained: "You could have a naked person advertising shower gel or a cream, but not a woman in a bikini draped across a car."[45]


Some feminists, such as Catharine MacKinnon, hold the view that pornography contributes to sexism, arguing that in pornographic performances for male spectators, actresses are reduced to mere objects for sexual use and abuse by men.[46] Feminists such as Helen Longino and Andrea Dworkin argue that pornography contributes to violence against women by eroticizing scenes in which women are dominated, coerced, humiliated, or even sexually assaulted.[47][48]


Radical feminists argue that prostitution is a sexist practice, which exploits women and which is the result of the existing patriarchal societal order, hence the laws from Sweden, Norway and Iceland, where it is illegal to pay for sex, but not to be a prostitute (the client commits a crime, but not the prostitute). These feminists believe that the assumptions that the bodily integrity and sexual pleasure of women are irrelevant, that women exist for men's sexual enjoyment, and that men cannot control themselves and are entitled to sex at any time, underlie the whole idea of prostitution, and make it an inherently exploitative, sexist practice.


Sexual dichotomies exist in language, though it is disputed whether certain language causes sexism, sexism causes certain language (see the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis) or that they are both caused by something else.

Sexist and gender-neutral language

Nearing the end of the 20th century, there is a rise in the use of gender-neutral language in western worlds. This is often attributed to the rise of feminism. Gender-neutral language is the avoidance of gender-specific job titles, non-parallel usage, and other usage that is felt by some to be sexist. Supporters feel that having gender-specific titles and gender-specific pronouns either implies a system bias to exclude individuals based on their gender, or else is as unnecessary in most cases as race-specific pronouns, religion-specific pronouns, or persons-height-specific pronouns. Some of those who support gender-specific pronouns assert that promoting gender-neutral language is a kind of "semantics injection" itself.

Anthropological linguistics and gender-specific language

Unlike the Indo-European languages in the west, for many other languages around the world, gender-specific pronouns are a recent phenomenon that occur around the early-20th century. As a result of colonialism, cultural revolution occurred in many parts of the world with attempts to "modernize" and "westernize" by adding gender-specific pronouns and animate-inanimate pronouns to local languages. This ironically resulted in the situation of what was gender-neutral pronouns a century ago suddenly becoming gender-specific. (See for example Gender-neutrality in languages without grammatical gender: Turkish.)

Reappropriation and reclamation

Reappropriation (aka reclamation projects) describe a cultural process by which certain groups reclaim or re-appropriate terms, symbols, and artifacts that were previously used to discriminate. Within the English language, terms like 'bitch' and 'slut', which had been historically used as pejorative sexist remarks against females. They have since been used to refer to a "strong, independent, unattached female" and a "sexually liberal, hypersexual female"[citation needed]. Similarly, terms like 'girlie men' and 'tranny', which has been historically used as pejorative sexist remarks against transsexes, have since been used to refer to the varying degree of transexuality for "pre-operation" and "non-operation" as whether they had undergone or will undergo sex-reassignment or not. The success of these cultural process has been disputed.


Occupational sexism

Occupational sexism refers to any discriminatory practices, statements, actions, etc. based on a person's sex that are present or occur in a place of employment. One form of occupational sexism is wage discrimination, which is prohibited in the US.[49]

Gender wage gap

Women have historically earned less than men; the reasons for the current wage gap are the subject of controversy.

In the 19th century and for much of the 20th, women were paid less than men for the same work. In the United States, this eventually led to the passing of the U.S. Equal Pay Act in 1963. At that time, women earned approximately 58 cents to a man's dollar.[50]

Today, women in the United States are estimated to earn roughly 75 percent of the income of men.[50][51] The difference in wages is reduced when factors such as hours worked and experience are controlled for. For instance, one study found that while women earn 69 cents for every dollar a man earns 10 years after graduating college. When experience, education, training and personal characteristics were controlled for, however, women earned over 96 cents for every dollar a man made 10 years after graduating college.[52] Unmarried women without children may earn 15 to 20 percent more than males in the same situation, depending upon geographical location in the US.[53][54]

Women are less likely to negotiate raises, and when they do negotiate, they are less likely to receive them.[55] David R. Hekman and colleagues found that women are less likely to negotiate because they are less valuable in the marketplace than equally well performing white men.[56] Hekman et al. (2009) found that customers who viewed videos featuring a black male, a white female, or a white male actor playing the role of an employee helping a customer were 19% more satisfied with the white male employee's performance and also were more satisfied with the store's cleanliness and appearance. This despite that all three actors performed identically, read the same script, and were in exactly the same location with identical camera angles and lighting. Moreover, 45 percent of the customers were women and 41 percent were non-white, indicating that even women and minority customers prefer white men. In a second study, they found that white male doctors were rated as more approachable and competent than equally-well performing women or minority doctors. They interpret their findings to suggest that employers are willing to pay more for white male employees because employers are customer driven and customers are happier with white male employees. They also suggest that what is required to solve the problem of wage inequality isn't necessarily paying women more but changing customer biases. This paper has been featured in many media outlets including The New York Times,[57] The Washington Post,[58] The Boston Globe,[59] and National Public Radio.[60] Perhaps because women are less valuable to customers than men, women are more likely to work part-time, to take more time off for their children, and join lower status professions.[61][62]

Research done at Cornell University and elsewhere indicates that mothers are 44 percent less likely to be hired than women with otherwise identical resumes, experience, and qualifications, and, if hired, are offered on average $USD 11,000 a year less than women without children.[63] Exactly the opposite form of discrimination is indicated for men; those without children earn, on average, $7,500 less than men with children.[61]

A factor that is used by some authors, such as Warren Farrell, to partially explain the wage gap is the fact that the majority of victims of workplace accidents are male. For example in Canada, the rate of workplace accidents was 30 times higher for men than for women in 2005[64] and in the U.S. 93% of people killed in the workplace in 2008 were men.[65]

A study by Schilt and Wiswall found that female-to-male transsexuals earn an average of 1.5% more after their transition, whereas male-to-female transsexuals earn an average of 32% less.[66]


Though sexism refers to beliefs and attitudes in relation to the gender of a person, such beliefs and attitudes are of a social nature and do not, normally, carry any legal consequences. Sex discrimination, on the other hand, may have legal consequences. Though what constitutes sex discrimination varies between countries, the essence is that it is an adverse action taken by one person against another person that would not have occurred had the person been of another sex. Discrimination of that nature in certain enumerated circumstances is illegal in many countries.

Sexual discrimination can arise in different contexts. For instance an employee may be discriminated against by being asked discriminatory questions during a job interview, or because an employer did not hire, promote or wrongfully terminated an employee based on his or her gender, or employers pay unequally based on gender. In an educational setting there could be claims that a student was excluded from an educational institution, program, opportunity, loan, student group, or scholarship on account of his or her gender. In the housing setting there could be claims that a person was refused negotiations on seeking a house, contracting/leasing a house or getting a loan based on his or her gender.

Socially, sexual differences have been used to justify different roles for men and women, in some cases giving rise to claims of primary and secondary roles. While there are non-physical differences between men and women, there is little agreement as to what those differences are.

The United Nations has stated (2006) that women struggle to break through a "glass ceiling", and that "progress in bringing women into leadership and decision-making positions around the world remains far too slow."[67] The Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on Gender Issues, Rachel Mayanja, said, "The past ten years have seen the fastest growth in the number of women in parliaments, yet even at this rate, parity between women and men in parliaments will not be reached until 2040."[67]

The term "glass ceiling" is used to describe a perceived barrier to advancement in employment and government based on discrimination, especially sex discrimination. In the United States, the Glass Ceiling Commission, a government-funded group, stated: "Over half of all Master’s degrees are now awarded to women, yet 95% of senior-level managers, of the top Fortune 1000 industrial and 500 service companies are men. Of them, 97% are white." In its report, it recommended reverse discrimination, which is the consideration of an employee's gender and race in hiring and promotion decisions, as a means to end this form of discrimination.[68]

Transgendered individuals, both male to female and female to male, often experience problems which often lead to dismissals, underachievement, difficulty in finding a job, social isolation, and, occasionally, violent attacks against them.

See also: Shyamala Rajender v. University of Minnesota

See also



  1. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 6th edition
  2. Brittan, Arthur (1984). Sexism, racism and oppression. Blackwell. p. 236. ISBN 9780855206748.
  3. Neuwirth, Jessica (2004). "Unequal: A Global Perspective on Women Under the Law". Ms. Magazine.
  4. "What is AIS?" AISSG. 13 Sep 2006.
  5. "Social Science Research Unit, University of London Review 2002". Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  6. Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England.
  7. 7.0 7.1 "Legacy '98: Detailed Timeline". 2001-09-19. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  8. Intimate Partner Violence, 1993-2001[dead link]
  9. "CDC - Injury - Intimate Partner Violence Consequences". 2010-10-28. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  10. "Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs, Home of the Duluth Model". Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  11. Joan Arehart-Treichel (2007-08-03). "Men Shouldn't Be Overlooked as Victims of Partner Violence — Psychiatric News". Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  12. "Microsoft Word - Kelly_ Chamblee.doc" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  13. "Percentage of women aged 15-49 who think that a husband is justified in hitting or beating his wife under certain circumstances". Childinfo. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
  14. Simon, Thomas R.; Anderson, Mark; Thompson, Martie P.; Crosby, Alex E.; Shelley, Gene; Sacks, Jeffrey J. (2001). "Attitudinal Acceptance of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults". Violence and Victims 16 (2): 115–126. PMID 11345473.
  15. Lisak, D.; Roth, S. (1988). "Motivational factors in nonincarcerated sexually aggressive men.". J Pers Soc Psychol 55 (5): 795–802. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.795. PMID 3210146.
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Odem, Mary E.;; Clay-Warner, Jody (1998). Confronting rape and sexual assault. Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources. pp. i-x. ISBN 978-0-8420-2599-7. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Odem" defined multiple times with different content
  17. Brownmiller, Susan (1992). Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. New York: Penguin Books, Limited. p. 480. ISBN 9780140139860.
  18. Odem, Mary E.;; Clay-Warner, Jody (1998). Confronting rape and sexual assault. Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources. pp. 130–140. ISBN 978-0-8420-2599-7.
  19. Odem, Mary E.;; Clay-Warner, Jody (1998). Confronting rape and sexual assault. Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources. p. xiv. ISBN 978-0-8420-2599-7.
  20. Bohmer, Carol (1991). "Acquaintance rape and the law". In Parrot, Andrea; Bechhofer, Laurie. Acquaintance rape: the hidden crime. New York: Wiley. pp. 317–333. ISBN 978-0-471-51023-9.
  21. Solomon, Barbara Miller. In the Company of Educated Women.
  22. Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory.
  23. National Center for Education Statistics,
  24. Halpern, Diane F. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. ISBN 080582792. Page 259.
  25. Sadker, Myra, and David Sadker. "Confronting Sexism in the College Classroom." In Gender in the Classroom: Power and Pedagogy. Ed. Susan L. Gabriel and Isaiah Smithson. Page 177.
  26. Sadker, Myra, and David Sadker. "Failing at Fairness: Hidden Lessons." In Mapping the social landscape: readings in sociology. Ed. Sandra J. Ferguson, Susan J. Ferguson. Taylor & Francies, 1999. ISBN 0-7674-0616-8. Page 350.
  27. Public Policy Sources,
  28. Statistics and indicators on women and men: Table 5g Women's wages relative to men's United Nations Statistics Division, 22 April 2005
  29. This number compares the income off all men and women who work 35 hours or more each week. See Institute for Women's Policy Research, 'Women's earnings fall: U.S. Census Bureau finds rising gender wage gap', media release, 27 August 2004, retrieved Dec 2007
  30. [1][dead link]
  31. Rosenberg, John (2006-09-19). "Discriminations: Fighting Gender Bias In Science ... With Gender Bias In Science". Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  32. Cavanagh, Sean (2009-02-17). "Gender Bias and Science - Curriculum Matters - Education Week". Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  34. New Scientist, issue 2639, 18 January 2008
  35. Wall Street Journal, p. B6, January 18, 2008
  36. Cross, Sam. "Women Excluded from Executive Positions."
  37. Newman, Melanie. "At the top, women still can't get a break from stereotypes."
  38. Julie Moult (11 April 2009). "Women's careers more tied to weight than men -- study". Archived from the original on 2012-09-05. Retrieved 2009-04-10.
  39. "Michigan Women's Music Festival ends policy of discrimination against Transwomen"
  40. Lesfest.
  41. Levy, Ariel (2005). Female Chauvinist Pigs. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0743249895.
  42. "Fierce, Funny, Feminists: Gloria Steinem and Kathleen Hanna - Funny Feminism". The Feminist eZine. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  43. Jeffreys, Sheila (2005). Beauty and Misogyny. pp. 37, 41. ISBN 0415351820.
  44. LeMoncheck, Linda (1985). Dehumanizing Women: Treating Persons as Sex Objects. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 48. ISBN 0847673316.
  45. Holmes, Stephanie (2008-04-25). "Scandinavian split on sexist ads". BBC News. Retrieved 2010-04-06.
  46. MacKinnon, Catharine (1987). Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 147.
  47. Longino, Helen (1980). “Pornography, Oppression, and Freedom: A Closer Look”, in Take Back the Night: Women on Pornography. L. Lederer (ed.), New York: William Morrow and Company. pp. 43–45.
  48. Dworkin, Andrea (1981). Pornography—Men Possessing Women. Perigee Trade.
  49. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. "Facts About Compensation Discrimination". Retrieved 2008-04-23.
  50. 50.0 50.1 The White House. "Explaining Trends in the Gender Wage Gap."
  51. Longley, Robert. "Gender Wage Gap Widening, Census Data Shows."
  52. AAUW Behind the Pay Gap
  53. "Are Women Earning More Than Men?". Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  54. Roberts, Sam. "For Young Earners in the Big City, A Gap in Women's Favor."
  55. Babcock, L. & Laschever, S. (2003) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton University Press
  56. Hekman, David R.; Aquino, Karl; Owens, Brad P.; Mitchell, Terence R.; Schilpzand, Pauline; Leavitt, Keith. (2009) An Examination of Whether and How Racial and Gender Biases Influence Customer Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal.
  57. Bakalar, Nicholas (2009) “A Customer Bias in Favor of White Men.” New York Times. June 23, 2009, page D6.
  58. Vedantam, Shankar (2009) “Caveat for Employers.” Washington Post, June 1, 2009, page A8
  59. Jackson, Derrick (2009) “Subtle, and stubborn, race bias.” Boston Globe, July 6, 2009, page A10
  60. National Public Radio, Lake Effect,
  61. 61.0 61.1 Lips, Hilary. "Blaming Women's Choices for the Gender Pay Gap."
  62. Longley, Robert. "Why Women Still Make Less Than Men."
  63. The Motherhood Manifesto.
  65. Ecomomix, Why did Workplace Deaths Decline in 2008,
  66. Cloud, John. "If Women Were More Like Men.",8599,1847194,00.html
  67. 67.0 67.1 "Women still struggle to break through glass ceiling in government, business, academia" (PDF). United Nations. 2006-03-08. Retrieved 2008-07-21.
  68. "A Solid Investment: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital". 1995-11. Retrieved 2008-05-23.

External links


als:Sexismus ar:تفرقة جنسية be-x-old:Сэксізм bs:Seksizam bg:Полова дискриминация ca:Sexisme cs:Sexismus da:Sexisme de:Sexismus et:Seksism el:Σεξισμός es:Sexismo eo:Seksismo fa:جنسیت‌گرایی fr:Sexisme ko:성 차별 hr:Seksizam id:Seksisme is:Kynjamismunun it:Sessismo he:אפליה מינית lv:Seksisms lt:Seksizmas ms:Seksisme mwl:Sexismo nl:Seksisme new:लिङ्गभेद ja:性差別 no:Kjønnsdiskriminering nn:Kjønnsdiskriminering pl:Seksizm pt:Sexismo ro:Sexism ru:Сексизм scn:Sissismu simple:Sexism sk:Sexizmus sl:Seksizem sr:Сексизам sh:Seksizam fi:Seksismi sv:Sexism tl:Seksismo th:เพศนิยม tr:Cinsiyetçilik uk:Сексизм vi:Phân biệt đối xử theo giới tính fiu-vro:Seksism zh:性別歧視主義

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.