The right to die is sometimes associated with the idea that one's body and one's life are one's own, to dispose of as one sees fit. However, there is sometimes deemed to be a legitimate state interest in preventing irrational suicides. Pilpel and Amsel write, "Contemporary proponents of ‘rational suicide’ or the ‘right to die’ usually demand by ‘rationality’ that the decision to kill oneself be both the autonomous choice of the agent (i.e., not due to the physician or the family pressuring them to ‘do the right thing’ and suicide) and a ‘best option under the circumstances’ choice desired by the stoics or utilitarians, as well as other natural conditions such as the choice being stable, not an impulsive decision, not due to mental illness, achieved after due deliberation, etc."
Hinduism accepts the right to die for those who have no desire, ambition or no responsibilities remaining; and allows death through the non-violent practice of fasting to death (Prayopavesa). Jainism has a similar practice named Santhara. See also other Religious views on suicide.
The term "right to die" refers to the idea that a person with a terminal illness and as put in serious condition should be allowed to commit suicide before death would otherwise occur. The concept is often referred to as dying without pain. The question of who, if anyone, should be empowered to make these decisions is often central to the debate.
A debate exists among ethicists whether the right to die is universal, or only applies under certain circumstances--such as terminal illness. A court in the American state of Montana, for example, has found that the right to die applies to those with life-threatening medical conditions. Suicide advocate Ludwig Minelli and bioethics professor Jacob Appel, in contrast, argue that all competent people have a right to end their own lives. Appel has suggested that the right to die is a useful litmus test for the overall freedom of a given society.
Most often, the idea of the right to die is related to a person's wish that caregivers allow death—for example, by not providing life support or vital medication—under certain conditions when recovery is highly unlikely or impossible. It may also refer to issues regarding physician-assisted suicide. It may be called passive euthanasia in cases where the patient is unable to make decisions about treatment. Living wills and Do Not Resuscitate orders are legal instruments that make a patient's treatment decisions known ahead of time; allowing a patient to die based on such decisions is not considered to be euthanasia. Usually these patients have also made explicit their wish to receive only palliative care to reduce pain and suffering.
Although specialized legal instruments differ from place to place, there are two more that are important in this context. The Five Wishes document allows a person to state in advance the priorities and values they wish to have honored at the end of life. And the Medical Durable Power of Attorney (or MDPOA) designates an agent to make decisions in case of incapacity, and can be used to give written guidance regarding end of life decision making. The MDPOA is generally considered to be the most powerful of all such instruments. All others may require interpretation on the part of health care providers or even court-appointed guardians; the MDPOA takes the job of interpretation out of the hands of strangers and gives it to a person selected and trusted by the individual.
In February 2010 a citizens' initiative called Uit Vrije Wil (Out of Free Will) further demanded that all Dutch people over 16 who feel tired of life should have the right to professional help in ending it. The organization, initiated by Milly van Stiphout and Yvonne van Baarle, started collecting signatures in support of this proposed change in Dutch legislation. A number of prominent Dutch citizens supported the initiative, including former ministers and artists, legal scholars and physicians. Among them were former politicians Frits Bolkestein, Hedy d'Ancona and Jan Terlouw, as well as television personality Mies Bouwman. Under current Dutch law, euthanasia by doctors is only legal in cases of "hopeless and unbearable" suffering. In practice this means that it is limited to those suffering from serious medical conditions and in considerable pain. Helping somebody to commit suicide without meeting the qualifications of the current Dutch euthanasia law is illegal.
See also Edit
- Advance Directives Act (Texas)
- Assisted suicide
- Betty and George Coumbias
- Bioethics / Medical ethics
- Derek Humphry
- Do not resuscitate
- Edward Brongersma
- Elizabeth Bouvia
- Final Exit
- Initiative 1000 (Washington)
- Jack Kevorkian
- Karen Ann Quinlan
- Living will
- Nancy Cruzan
- Oregon Death with Dignity Act
- Patient refusal of nutrition and hydration
- Philip Nitschke
- Ramón Sampedro
- Right to Die? (documentary)
- Sue Rodriguez
- Terri Schiavo
- Tirhas Habtegiris
- ↑ A Pilpel, L Amsel, What is Wrong with Rational Suicide, http://www.avitalpilpel.com/uploads/What_is_wrong_with_rational_suicide_April_2010.pdf
- ↑ "Hinduism - Euthanasia and Suicide". BBC. 2009-08-25. http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/hinduism/hinduethics/euthanasia.shtml.
- ↑ Next: Assisted Suicide for Healthy People
- ↑ "'Right to die' for elderly back at centre of Dutch debate"
- ↑ " Citizens group argues 'right to die' - A citizens action group wants to legalise assisted suicide for all people over 70"
- ↑ Template:Nl"70-plus eist zachte dood"
- The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia.
- A suicide right for the mentally ill? A Swiss case opens a new debate.
- Template:Nl"Uit Vrije Wil - Burgerinitiatief voltooid leven"es:Auxilio al suicidio