Maputo Protocol

The Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, better known as the Maputo Protocol, guarantees comprehensive rights to women including the right to take part in the political process, to social and political equality with men, to control of their reproductive health, and an end to female genital mutilation. As the name suggests, it was adopted by the African Union in the form of a protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Origins
Following on from recognition that women's rights were often marginalized in the context of human rights, a meeting organized by Women in Law and Development in Africa (WiLDAF) in March, 1995, in Lomé, Togo called for the development of a specific protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights to address the rights of women. The OAU assembly mandated the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) to develop such a protocol at its 31st Ordinary Session in June, 1995, in Addis Ababa.

A first draft produced by an expert group of members of the ACHPR, representatives of African NGOs and international observers, organized by the ACHPR in collaboration with the International Commission of Jurists, was submitted to the ACHPR at its 22nd Session in October 1997, and circulated for comments to other NGOs. Revision in cooperation with involved NGO's took place at different sessions from October to January, and in April 1998, the 23rd session of the ACHPR endorsed the appointment of Julienne Ondziel Gnelenga, a Congolese lawyer, as the first Special Rapporteur on Women's Rights in Africa, mandating her to work towards the adoption of the draft protocol on women’s rights. The OAU Secretariat received the completed draft in 1999, and in 2000 at Addis Ababa it was merged with the Draft Convention on Traditional Practices in a joint session of the Inter Africa Committee and the ACHPR. After further work at experts meetings and conferences during 2001, the process stalled and the protocol was not presented at the inaugual summit of the AU in 2002.

In early 2003, Equality Now hosted a conference of women's groups, to organize a campaign to lobby the African Union to adopt the protocol, and the protocol's text was brought up to international standards. The lobbying was successful, the African Union resumed the process and the finished document was officially adopted by the section sumit of the African Union, on July 11, 2003.

Adoption and ratification
The protocol was adopted by the African Union on 11 July 2003 at its second summit in Maputo, Mozambique. On 25 November 2005, having been ratified by the required 15 member nations of the African Union, the protocol entered into force.

Of the 53 member countries in the African Union, the heads of states of 46 countries signed the protocol, and as of July 2010, 28 of those countries had ratified and deposited the protocol.

Signed by
Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Comoros, Congo, Djibouti, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Kenya, Libya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Mali, Mozambique, Mauritius, Namibia, Nigeria, Niger, Rwanda, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Ratified by
Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Libya, Lesotho, Liberia, Mali, Malawi, Mozambique, Mauritania, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe

Neither signed nor ratified by
Botswana, Egypt, Eritrea, Tunisia

Reservations
At the Maputo Summit, several countries expressed reservations.

Tunisia, Sudan, Kenya, Namibia and South Africa recorded reservations about some of the marriage clauses. Egypt, Libya, Sudan, South Africa and Zambia had reservations about "judicial separation, divorce and annulment of marriage." Burundi, Senegal, Sudan, Rwanda and Libya held reservations with Article 14, relating to the "right to health and control of reproduction." Libya expressed reservations about a point relating to conflicts.

Articles
The main articles are:
 * Article 2: Elimination of Discrimination Against Women
 * Article 3: Right to Dignity
 * Article 4: The Rights to Life, Integrity and Security of the Person
 * Article 5: Elimination of Harmful Practices
 * This refers to female genital mutilation and other traditional practices that are harmful to women.
 * Article 6: Marriage
 * Article 7: Separation, Divorce and Annulment of Marriage
 * Article 8: Access to Justice and Equal Protection before the Law
 * Article 9: Right to Participation in the Political and Decision-Making Process
 * Article 10: Right to Peace
 * Article 11: Protection of Women in Armed Conflicts
 * Article 12: Right to Education and Training
 * Article 13: Economic and Social Welfare Rights
 * Article 14: Health and Reproductive Rights
 * Article 15: Right to Food Security
 * Article 16: Right to Adequate Housing
 * Article 17: Right to Positive Cultural Context
 * Article 18: Right to a Healthy and Sustainable Environment
 * Article 19: Right to Sustainable Development
 * Article 20: Widows' Rights
 * Article 21: Right to Inheritance
 * Article 22: Special Protection of Elderly Women
 * Article 23: Special Protection of Women with Disabilities
 * Article 24: Special Protection of Women in Distress
 * Article 25: Remedies

Opposition
There are two particularly contentious factors driving opposition to the Protocol: its article on reproductive health, which is opposed mainly by Catholics and other Christians, and its articles on female genital mutilation, polygamous marriage and other traditional practices, which are opposed mainly by Muslims.

Christian opposition
Pope Benedict XVI has described the Protocol as "an attempt to trivialize abortion surreptitiously". The Roman Catholic bishops of Africa oppose the Maputo Protocol because it defines abortion as a human right. The US-based pro-life advocacy organization, Human Life International, describes it as "a Trojan horse for a radical agenda."

In Uganda, the powerful Joint Christian Council has successfully opposed moves to ratify the treaty on the grounds that Article 14, in guaranteeing abortion "in cases of sexual assault, rape, incest, and where the continued pregnancy endangers the mental and physical health of the mother or the life of the mother or the foetus," is incompatible with traditional Christian morality. In an open letter to the government and people of Uganda in January, 2006, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Uganda set out their opposition to the ratification of the Maputo Protocol. It got later ratified on 22 July, 2010.

Muslim opposition
In Niger, the Parliament voted 42 to 31, with 4 abstentions, against ratifying it in June, 2006; in this Muslim country, several traditions banned or deprecated by the Protocol are common. Nigerien Muslim women's groups in 2009 gathered in Niamey to protest what they called "the satanic Maputo protocols", specifying limits to marriage age of girls and abortion as objectionable.

In Djibouti, however, the Protocol was ratified in February, 2005 after a subregional conference on female genital mutilation called by the Djibouti government and No Peace Without Justice, at which the Djibouti Declaration on female genital mutilation was adopted. The document declares that the Koran does not support female genital mutilation, and on the contrary practising genital mutilation on women goes against the precepts of Islam.